
No barrage-type tidal energy projects have been initiated in 25 years, mostly due to concerns about high construction costs and fears of negative ecological effects. While construction costs continue as a roadblock for such projects, some negative ecological effects now taken for granted might be “misplaced fears.”
That’s one of the conclusions of a study published in early October in Ecological Solutions and Evidence, a journal of the British Ecological Society. Titled “Misplaced fears? What the evidence reveals of the ecological effects of tidal power generation,” the study reviewed 54 articles related to tidal power system construction and operation and concludes that “few of the widespread [tidal energy ecological] concerns are substantiated by evidence or in long-term monitoring of existing projects.”
The study points out how objections to tidal power projects “often stem from perceptions of adverse ecological effects.” It states, however, that only a few of these adverse effects are backed by evidence or by long-term monitoring of existing tide power installations. What’s more, some projects may have positive ecological effects. The key to minimizing harmful effects, say the authors of the October study, is keeping a tidal regime similar to its original state.
The articles and papers reviewed in this study confirm that tidal projects can change hydrodynamics and sediment changes at barrage-type (tidal range) installations such as the LaRance station in France and the Annapolis Royal station in Canada. But many other objections to such projects “remain unsubstantiated” or have only neutral effects on marine ecosystems. Some positive effects identified are more productivity and greater species diversity in tidal range basins.
Continue reading “Study Challenges Tidal Energy Ecology Fears”



